I manually stacked with WSC and LFC and, yes, the rejection of LFC is more aggressive.But I'm not enough comfortable with the parameters of pixel rejection to have the same result with the two algorithms.
So, if I understand correctly, the conclusio…
The only difference is the Rejection algorithm.WBPP used "Winsorized Sigma Clipping" when I used "Linear Fit Clipping" (see attached images).
My understanding was that above 25 files, "Linear Fit Clipping" was a better choice.
And here are the 2 Masterdark :- One build manually with ImageIntegration
- One build with WBPP
So, I have a problem because they're not the same.
Jean-Francois
I watched the video and checked with my calibrated Ha files and I have a lot of zero points (in both case).So I processed again all my Ha raw files in WBPP with a pedestal (100), twice, and checked that I had no more zero points.But unfortunately, t…
I watched again your video about manual calibration and compared the WBPP Masterdark and mine with Pixelmath (difference between two darkframe + 0.5).The result is a grey image, but the values are not always 0.5. They are between 0.4998 and 0.5, so …
So, the new process in WBPP with the right darks@180 was a success ! Even if the masterdark@180 seems weird...I didn't imagine that this type of error could have such a strong impact on the result.
I have to thank you again because I wouldn't found …
You have to wait to receive the third file.It's a zip file.Just double click on this file and all the files will be automatically extracted.
Jean-Francois
Hi,
Yes of course. I will be pleased to provide you my raw files.I have :L (180 sec) : 45 Light + 30 Flat + 30 DarkFlatL (300 sec) : 47 Light + 30 Flat + 30 DarkFlat R (180 sec) : 73 Light + 30 Flat + 30 DarkFlat
B (180 sec) : 33 Light + 60 Flat +…